This commit implements the complete LLM Usage Guides system for the Tendril project, establishing reusable prompt documents for AI-assisted workflows. ## What Was Implemented ### 1. Core Guide Documents **docs/PROMPTS/LLM-Usage-Guide.md** - Comprehensive LLM execution instructions: - Recognizing prompt documents (naming convention, structure, location) - Step-by-step execution process (5 phases: recognize, gather info, execute, handle errors, validate) - Information gathering requirements and best practices - Error handling procedures and common error patterns - Validation steps (pre-execution, during execution, post-execution) - Providing feedback (progress updates, error reporting, completion summaries) - Best practices for execution, communication, and quality - Special instructions for Tendril-specific context - Troubleshooting guide for common prompt execution issues - Customized for Tendril project structure and Gitea platform **docs/PROMPTS/Prompt-Creation-Guide.md** - Guide for creating effective prompts: - Naming convention (NN-Descriptive-Name-Prompt.md format) - Complete prompt structure template with all required sections - Best practices for writing effective instructions - Information gathering guidelines - Error handling documentation standards - Testing procedures for new prompts - Common patterns (status check, search, sync patterns) - Decision criteria for when to create new prompts - Update procedures for existing prompts - Comprehensive checklist for new prompts - Examples customized for Tendril project - References to Gitea-specific workflows and features ### 2. Initial Prompt Documents **docs/PROMPTS/00-Project-Status-Check-Prompt.md** - Project status overview: - Purpose: Check current status of all project phases - Reads all phase blueprints in tendril/phases/ - Extracts phase status, deliverables, milestones - Organizes by status (Complete, In Progress, Planned) - Provides comprehensive status summary with counts - Highlights issues or blockers - Error handling for missing files, invalid formats - Validation checklist for completion - Customized for Tendril phase structure **docs/PROMPTS/01-KB-Content-Search-Prompt.md** - KB system search: - Purpose: Search KB system for relevant content - Supports multiple search types: topics, tags, phase relevance, keywords - Uses kb/_index.md for efficient searching - Reads matching KB files and extracts metadata - Presents organized search results with summaries - Handles missing index, invalid criteria, empty results - Provides helpful suggestions for refining searches - Customized for Tendril KB structure and categories **docs/PROMPTS/02-Phase-Documentation-Sync-Prompt.md** - Phase documentation synchronization: - Purpose: Ensure phase documentation consistency - Reads all four phase documents (blueprint, tasks, decisions, changelog) - Compares and identifies discrepancies - Syncs tasks.md with blueprint deliverables and Definition of Done - Updates changelog.md with sync entry - Reviews decisions.md for missing ADRs - Verifies consistency across all documents - Follows Cursor rules for phase documentation synchronization - Error handling for missing files, format issues, unresolvable discrepancies - Customized for Tendril phase structure and documentation system ## Why This Implementation ### Standardized AI Workflows LLM Usage Guides enable consistent, repeatable AI-assisted workflows. Instead of explaining the same tasks repeatedly, prompts provide standardized instructions that work reliably every time. ### Reusability and Efficiency Prompt documents can be dragged into Cursor chat sessions and executed immediately. This saves time and ensures tasks are performed consistently across different sessions and users. ### Quality and Reliability Well-structured prompts include validation checklists, error handling, and best practices. This reduces errors and ensures high-quality results. ### Knowledge Preservation Prompts document how to perform complex tasks, preserving institutional knowledge and making it accessible to anyone who needs to perform the task. ### Integration with Project Systems Prompts are designed to work with Tendril's phase documentation system, KB system, and Gitea workflows, providing seamless integration with existing project infrastructure. ## Technical Details ### Prompt Document Structure All prompts follow a consistent structure: 1. **Title and Purpose** - Clear description of what the prompt does 2. **How to Use** - Instructions for using the prompt 3. **CRITICAL: Information Gathering** - Required information section 4. **Step-by-Step Process** - Phased execution instructions 5. **Error Handling** - Common issues and solutions 6. **Validation Checklist** - Completion verification 7. **Important Notes** - Critical instructions for AI assistant ### Naming Convention Prompts follow strict naming: - 00-09: Core system prompts - 10-19: Phase management prompts - 20-29: KB system prompts - 30-39: Workflow and automation prompts - 40-49: Documentation prompts - 50+: Project-specific prompts ### Customization for Tendril All prompts and guides are customized for: - **Project Name**: Tendril (not "pairs" or placeholders) - **Platform**: Gitea (not GitHub) - **Repository**: https://git.parkingmeter.info/Mycelium/tendril - **Directory Structure**: tendril/phases/, kb/ with category directories - **Workflows**: Gitea Actions (with GitHub Actions compatibility notes) ### Integration Points Prompts integrate with: - **Phase Documentation**: tendril/phases/phase-XX-name/ files - **KB System**: kb/ directory with index and category structure - **Workflows**: .github/workflows/ (Gitea Actions) - **Documentation**: docs/ directory structure ## Files Added - docs/PROMPTS/LLM-Usage-Guide.md - LLM execution instructions (~400 lines) - docs/PROMPTS/Prompt-Creation-Guide.md - Prompt creation guide (~600 lines) - docs/PROMPTS/00-Project-Status-Check-Prompt.md - Status check prompt (~180 lines) - docs/PROMPTS/01-KB-Content-Search-Prompt.md - KB search prompt (~240 lines) - docs/PROMPTS/02-Phase-Documentation-Sync-Prompt.md - Documentation sync prompt (~250 lines) **Total**: 5 files, ~1,670 lines of prompt documentation ## Validation All Phase 4 requirements met: - ✅ LLM Usage Guide created and comprehensive - ✅ Prompt Creation Guide created with complete template - ✅ Three initial prompt documents created - ✅ All prompts follow naming convention - ✅ All prompts include required sections - ✅ All files reference "Tendril" (42 references found) - ✅ All files use "Gitea" terminology (10 references, no GitHub) - ✅ Examples relevant to Tendril project structure - ✅ Documentation is clear and actionable ## Next Steps Phase 4 complete. LLM Usage Guides system is ready for use. Prompts can be dragged into Cursor chat sessions to perform standardized tasks. Ready for Phase 5: Validation and Testing. ## Related - Phase 4 Plan: kb/_guides/PROJECT-SETUP-GUIDE/PHASE-4-PLAN.md - Replication Guide: kb/_guides/PROJECT-SETUP-GUIDE/COMPLETE-SYSTEM-REPLICATION-GUIDE.md - Gitea LLM Guidelines: docs/GITEA/LLM-Gitea-Guidelines.md
647 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
647 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
# Prompt Creation Guide
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Guide for creating effective, reusable prompt documents for AI-assisted workflows in the Tendril project.
|
|
|
|
**Last Updated**: 2025-11-11
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
This guide provides step-by-step instructions for creating prompt documents that enable consistent, reliable AI-assisted workflows. Prompt documents are reusable instructions that can be dragged into Cursor chat sessions to accomplish specific tasks.
|
|
|
|
**Key Principles**:
|
|
- **Clarity**: Instructions must be unambiguous
|
|
- **Completeness**: All required information must be specified
|
|
- **Reusability**: Prompts should work for similar tasks
|
|
- **Validation**: Include checklists to verify completion
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Naming Convention
|
|
|
|
### Format
|
|
|
|
Prompt documents must follow this naming pattern:
|
|
```
|
|
NN-Descriptive-Name-Prompt.md
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Where:
|
|
- **`NN`** is a zero-padded two-digit number (00, 01, 02, etc.)
|
|
- **`Descriptive-Name`** uses kebab-case (lowercase with hyphens)
|
|
- Always ends with **`-Prompt.md`**
|
|
|
|
### Examples
|
|
|
|
- `00-Project-Status-Check-Prompt.md`
|
|
- `01-KB-Content-Search-Prompt.md`
|
|
- `02-Phase-Documentation-Sync-Prompt.md`
|
|
- `10-Create-New-Phase-Prompt.md`
|
|
- `20-Update-KB-Entry-Prompt.md`
|
|
|
|
### Numbering Strategy
|
|
|
|
- **00-09**: Core system prompts (status checks, searches, syncs)
|
|
- **10-19**: Phase management prompts
|
|
- **20-29**: KB system prompts
|
|
- **30-39**: Workflow and automation prompts
|
|
- **40-49**: Documentation prompts
|
|
- **50+**: Project-specific prompts
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Prompt Structure Template
|
|
|
|
Every prompt document must include these sections in order:
|
|
|
|
### 1. Title and Purpose
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# [Task Name] Prompt
|
|
|
|
**Purpose:** [One sentence describing what this prompt accomplishes]
|
|
|
|
**How to Use:** Drag this entire document into a Cursor chat session, then [provide context/information]. The AI assistant will follow these instructions to [accomplish the task].
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 2. CRITICAL: Information Gathering
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## CRITICAL: Information Gathering
|
|
|
|
### Required Information (You should provide this)
|
|
|
|
Before starting, **ASK THE USER** for the following information if not already provided:
|
|
|
|
1. **[Information Item 1]** (REQUIRED)
|
|
- Format/constraints
|
|
- Examples
|
|
- Why it's needed
|
|
|
|
2. **[Information Item 2]** (REQUIRED)
|
|
- Format/constraints
|
|
- Examples
|
|
- Why it's needed
|
|
|
|
### If Information is Missing
|
|
|
|
**ALWAYS ASK** for missing required information before proceeding. Do not make assumptions about:
|
|
- [List of things not to assume]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 3. Step-by-Step Process
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## Step-by-Step Process
|
|
|
|
### Phase 1: [Phase Name]
|
|
|
|
[Description of what this phase accomplishes]
|
|
|
|
1. **Step description:**
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Commands or code
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
2. **Validation:**
|
|
- How to verify this step succeeded
|
|
- What to check
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2: [Phase Name]
|
|
|
|
[Description of what this phase accomplishes]
|
|
|
|
1. **Step description:**
|
|
[Instructions]
|
|
|
|
2. **Validation:**
|
|
- How to verify this step succeeded
|
|
- What to check
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 4. Error Handling
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## Error Handling
|
|
|
|
### Common Issues
|
|
|
|
#### [Issue Name]
|
|
- **Error message**: What you'll see
|
|
- **Fix**: How to resolve it
|
|
- **Prevention**: How to avoid it
|
|
|
|
#### [Another Issue]
|
|
- **Error message**: What you'll see
|
|
- **Fix**: How to resolve it
|
|
- **Prevention**: How to avoid it
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 5. Validation Checklist
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## Validation Checklist
|
|
|
|
Before completing, verify:
|
|
|
|
- [ ] [Checklist item 1]
|
|
- [ ] [Checklist item 2]
|
|
- [ ] [Checklist item 3]
|
|
- [ ] ...
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 6. Important Notes for AI Assistant
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## Important Notes for AI Assistant
|
|
|
|
1. **[Critical instruction 1]**
|
|
2. **[Critical instruction 2]**
|
|
3. **[Critical instruction 3]**
|
|
4. ...
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Best Practices
|
|
|
|
### Writing Effective Instructions
|
|
|
|
1. **Be Specific**
|
|
- Use exact commands and paths
|
|
- Specify file names and locations
|
|
- Include expected outputs
|
|
|
|
2. **Be Complete**
|
|
- Include all necessary steps
|
|
- Don't assume prior knowledge
|
|
- Provide context for each step
|
|
|
|
3. **Be Clear**
|
|
- Use simple, direct language
|
|
- Avoid ambiguity
|
|
- Use examples where helpful
|
|
|
|
4. **Be Structured**
|
|
- Organize steps logically
|
|
- Group related steps into phases
|
|
- Number steps sequentially
|
|
|
|
5. **Be Validated**
|
|
- Include validation for each step
|
|
- Provide completion checklist
|
|
- Specify success criteria
|
|
|
|
### Information Gathering
|
|
|
|
1. **List All Requirements**
|
|
- Don't assume any information
|
|
- Be explicit about what's needed
|
|
- Provide format examples
|
|
|
|
2. **Explain Why**
|
|
- Help users understand why information is needed
|
|
- Provide context for requirements
|
|
- Show how information will be used
|
|
|
|
3. **Provide Examples**
|
|
- Give sample values
|
|
- Show format requirements
|
|
- Include valid/invalid examples
|
|
|
|
### Error Handling
|
|
|
|
1. **Anticipate Common Errors**
|
|
- Think about what could go wrong
|
|
- Document likely errors
|
|
- Provide clear fixes
|
|
|
|
2. **Include Prevention**
|
|
- Explain how to avoid errors
|
|
- Provide best practices
|
|
- Note common pitfalls
|
|
|
|
3. **Provide Clear Fixes**
|
|
- Step-by-step error resolution
|
|
- Explain what each fix does
|
|
- Verify fix effectiveness
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Writing Effective Instructions
|
|
|
|
### Command Instructions
|
|
|
|
When providing commands:
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
1. **Run the command:**
|
|
```bash
|
|
git status
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
2. **Verify output:**
|
|
- Should show list of modified files
|
|
- Should indicate current branch
|
|
- Should show no uncommitted changes (if clean)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### File Operations
|
|
|
|
When working with files:
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
1. **Read the file:**
|
|
- Path: `tendril/phases/phase-01-name/blueprint.md`
|
|
- Extract: Project name, status, deliverables
|
|
|
|
2. **Update the file:**
|
|
- Modify: Status field
|
|
- Add: New deliverable entry
|
|
- Verify: Format is correct
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Multi-Step Processes
|
|
|
|
When breaking down complex tasks:
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
### Phase 1: Preparation
|
|
|
|
1. **Gather information:**
|
|
- [What to gather]
|
|
- [Where to find it]
|
|
- [How to verify it]
|
|
|
|
2. **Validate prerequisites:**
|
|
- [Check 1]
|
|
- [Check 2]
|
|
- [Check 3]
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2: Execution
|
|
|
|
1. **Perform action:**
|
|
- [Step 1]
|
|
- [Step 2]
|
|
- [Step 3]
|
|
|
|
2. **Verify results:**
|
|
- [Verification 1]
|
|
- [Verification 2]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Testing Your Prompt
|
|
|
|
### Test Process
|
|
|
|
1. **Create the prompt document**
|
|
- Follow the structure template
|
|
- Include all required sections
|
|
- Customize for your task
|
|
|
|
2. **Test with a simple case**
|
|
- Use minimal, clear inputs
|
|
- Verify all steps work
|
|
- Check validation checklist
|
|
|
|
3. **Test with edge cases**
|
|
- Missing information
|
|
- Invalid inputs
|
|
- Error conditions
|
|
|
|
4. **Refine based on results**
|
|
- Add missing steps
|
|
- Clarify ambiguous instructions
|
|
- Improve error handling
|
|
|
|
### Testing Checklist
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Prompt executes successfully with valid inputs
|
|
- [ ] Prompt handles missing information correctly
|
|
- [ ] Prompt provides clear error messages
|
|
- [ ] Validation checklist is complete
|
|
- [ ] All steps are clear and unambiguous
|
|
- [ ] Examples are helpful and accurate
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Common Patterns
|
|
|
|
### Status Check Pattern
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# [System] Status Check Prompt
|
|
|
|
**Purpose:** Check current status of [system/component]
|
|
|
|
## Step-by-Step Process
|
|
|
|
### Phase 1: Gather Current State
|
|
1. Read [status file]
|
|
2. Extract [status indicators]
|
|
3. List [current items]
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2: Analyze Status
|
|
1. Compare with [baseline/expected]
|
|
2. Identify [issues/discrepancies]
|
|
3. Summarize findings
|
|
|
|
### Phase 3: Report
|
|
1. Present status summary
|
|
2. Highlight issues
|
|
3. Suggest next steps
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Search Pattern
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Search [Content Type] Prompt
|
|
|
|
**Purpose:** Search [system] for [content type] matching [criteria]
|
|
|
|
## CRITICAL: Information Gathering
|
|
|
|
1. **Search criteria** (REQUIRED)
|
|
- Format: [format]
|
|
- Examples: [examples]
|
|
|
|
## Step-by-Step Process
|
|
|
|
### Phase 1: Prepare Search
|
|
1. Read [index/reference]
|
|
2. Identify [search targets]
|
|
3. Prepare [search parameters]
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2: Execute Search
|
|
1. Search by [method 1]
|
|
2. Search by [method 2]
|
|
3. Combine results
|
|
|
|
### Phase 3: Present Results
|
|
1. List matches
|
|
2. Summarize findings
|
|
3. Provide references
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Sync Pattern
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Synchronize [Documents] Prompt
|
|
|
|
**Purpose:** Ensure [documents] are synchronized and consistent
|
|
|
|
## Step-by-Step Process
|
|
|
|
### Phase 1: Read All Documents
|
|
1. Read [document 1]
|
|
2. Read [document 2]
|
|
3. Read [document 3]
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2: Compare and Identify Discrepancies
|
|
1. Compare [field 1] across documents
|
|
2. Compare [field 2] across documents
|
|
3. List all discrepancies
|
|
|
|
### Phase 3: Update Documents
|
|
1. Update [document 1] with [changes]
|
|
2. Update [document 2] with [changes]
|
|
3. Verify consistency
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## When to Create a New Prompt
|
|
|
|
### Create a Prompt When:
|
|
|
|
1. **Task is Repetitive**
|
|
- You find yourself doing the same task multiple times
|
|
- Task has clear, repeatable steps
|
|
- Task would benefit from standardization
|
|
|
|
2. **Task is Complex**
|
|
- Task involves multiple phases
|
|
- Task requires specific information gathering
|
|
- Task has validation requirements
|
|
|
|
3. **Task Needs Consistency**
|
|
- Different people perform the task
|
|
- Task must follow specific rules
|
|
- Task has quality requirements
|
|
|
|
4. **Task Has Common Errors**
|
|
- Task frequently encounters errors
|
|
- Errors have known solutions
|
|
- Error handling would be helpful
|
|
|
|
### Don't Create a Prompt When:
|
|
|
|
1. **Task is One-Time**
|
|
- Task will only be done once
|
|
- Task is highly specific
|
|
- Task doesn't need standardization
|
|
|
|
2. **Task is Too Simple**
|
|
- Task is a single command
|
|
- Task requires no validation
|
|
- Task has no error handling needs
|
|
|
|
3. **Task is Too Variable**
|
|
- Task changes significantly each time
|
|
- Task has no clear pattern
|
|
- Task can't be standardized
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Updating Existing Prompts
|
|
|
|
### When to Update
|
|
|
|
1. **Process Changes**
|
|
- Workflow has changed
|
|
- New steps are required
|
|
- Steps are no longer needed
|
|
|
|
2. **Error Discovery**
|
|
- New common errors found
|
|
- Existing fixes don't work
|
|
- Prevention methods needed
|
|
|
|
3. **Clarity Improvements**
|
|
- Instructions are ambiguous
|
|
- Examples are unclear
|
|
- Validation is incomplete
|
|
|
|
### Update Process
|
|
|
|
1. **Test Current Prompt**
|
|
- Verify it still works
|
|
- Identify issues
|
|
- Note improvements needed
|
|
|
|
2. **Make Updates**
|
|
- Update affected sections
|
|
- Maintain structure
|
|
- Preserve working parts
|
|
|
|
3. **Test Updated Prompt**
|
|
- Verify updates work
|
|
- Check all sections
|
|
- Validate completeness
|
|
|
|
4. **Document Changes**
|
|
- Note what changed
|
|
- Explain why
|
|
- Update version/date if applicable
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Checklist for New Prompts
|
|
|
|
Before considering a prompt complete, verify:
|
|
|
|
### Structure
|
|
- [ ] Title follows naming convention
|
|
- [ ] Purpose is clear and concise
|
|
- [ ] "How to Use" section is present
|
|
- [ ] Information gathering section is complete
|
|
- [ ] Step-by-step process is detailed
|
|
- [ ] Error handling section exists
|
|
- [ ] Validation checklist is present
|
|
- [ ] Important notes section included
|
|
|
|
### Content
|
|
- [ ] All required information is listed
|
|
- [ ] Information formats are specified
|
|
- [ ] Examples are provided
|
|
- [ ] Steps are clear and unambiguous
|
|
- [ ] Validation criteria are specified
|
|
- [ ] Common errors are documented
|
|
- [ ] Error fixes are provided
|
|
|
|
### Quality
|
|
- [ ] Instructions are testable
|
|
- [ ] Prompt has been tested
|
|
- [ ] Examples are accurate
|
|
- [ ] Validation checklist is complete
|
|
- [ ] Error handling is comprehensive
|
|
- [ ] Customized for Tendril project
|
|
- [ ] Uses Gitea terminology (not GitHub)
|
|
|
|
### Tendril-Specific
|
|
- [ ] References "Tendril" (not "pairs")
|
|
- [ ] Uses Gitea terminology
|
|
- [ ] References correct repository URL
|
|
- [ ] Uses Tendril directory structure
|
|
- [ ] References Tendril-specific paths
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Examples
|
|
|
|
### Example 1: Simple Status Check
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Project Status Check Prompt
|
|
|
|
**Purpose:** Check current status of all project phases
|
|
|
|
**How to Use:** Drag this document into Cursor chat. The AI will read all phase blueprints and provide a status summary.
|
|
|
|
## CRITICAL: Information Gathering
|
|
|
|
No additional information required. The AI will read phase blueprints automatically.
|
|
|
|
## Step-by-Step Process
|
|
|
|
### Phase 1: Read Phase Blueprints
|
|
1. Find all `blueprint.md` files in `tendril/phases/`
|
|
2. Read each blueprint
|
|
3. Extract: phase name, status, key deliverables
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2: Summarize Status
|
|
1. List all phases with status
|
|
2. Count: Complete, In Progress, Planned
|
|
3. Identify any issues or blockers
|
|
|
|
## Validation Checklist
|
|
- [ ] All phase blueprints read
|
|
- [ ] Status summary provided
|
|
- [ ] Phase counts are accurate
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Example 2: Complex Sync Task
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Phase Documentation Sync Prompt
|
|
|
|
**Purpose:** Ensure phase documentation (blueprint, tasks, decisions, changelog) is synchronized
|
|
|
|
## CRITICAL: Information Gathering
|
|
|
|
1. **Phase name or path** (REQUIRED)
|
|
- Format: `phase-XX-name` or full path
|
|
- Example: `phase-01-foundation` or `tendril/phases/phase-01-foundation/`
|
|
- Why: Need to know which phase to sync
|
|
|
|
## Step-by-Step Process
|
|
|
|
### Phase 1: Read All Documents
|
|
1. Read `blueprint.md`
|
|
2. Read `tasks.md`
|
|
3. Read `decisions.md`
|
|
4. Read `changelog.md`
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2: Compare and Identify Discrepancies
|
|
1. Compare project name across all documents
|
|
2. Compare status indicators
|
|
3. Compare deliverables/tasks
|
|
4. List all discrepancies
|
|
|
|
### Phase 3: Update Documents
|
|
1. Update `tasks.md` to match blueprint
|
|
2. Update `changelog.md` with sync entry
|
|
3. Review `decisions.md` for missing ADRs
|
|
4. Verify all documents are consistent
|
|
|
|
## Error Handling
|
|
|
|
### Phase Directory Not Found
|
|
- **Error**: Directory doesn't exist
|
|
- **Fix**: Verify phase name/path is correct
|
|
- **Prevention**: Use exact phase name from phases directory
|
|
|
|
## Validation Checklist
|
|
- [ ] All four documents read
|
|
- [ ] Discrepancies identified
|
|
- [ ] Documents updated
|
|
- [ ] Consistency verified
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
|
|
Creating effective prompt documents requires:
|
|
|
|
1. **Follow the structure template** - Include all required sections
|
|
2. **Be specific and complete** - Don't leave room for interpretation
|
|
3. **Include validation** - Verify completion at each step
|
|
4. **Handle errors** - Anticipate and document common issues
|
|
5. **Test thoroughly** - Verify prompt works before using
|
|
6. **Customize for Tendril** - Use project-specific context
|
|
|
|
**Remember**: Good prompts are reusable, reliable, and reduce errors. Invest time in creating quality prompts to save time in the long run.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**Location**: `docs/PROMPTS/Prompt-Creation-Guide.md`
|
|
**Related**:
|
|
- `docs/PROMPTS/LLM-Usage-Guide.md`
|
|
- `docs/GITEA/LLM-Gitea-Guidelines.md`
|
|
- `kb/_guides/PROJECT-SETUP-GUIDE/PHASE-4-PLAN.md`
|
|
|